This page collects discussion, as well as open and resolved issues, regarding the OGC resolver.
Generally speaking, n-D CRS handling is a young, very dynamic field. Therefore, sometimes new requirements come in from stakeholders.
Issues Open
(none currently)
Issues Resolved
Abbreviation Changes in EPSG Database
Axis abbreviation "long" has been changed to "lon" in EPSG geodetic dataset after 8.5. This is not an incompatible change since axis abbreviations are not identifiers and do not affect numerical computation; they are more like metadata. But some software are nevertheless affected by this change. For this reason, upgrading the EPSG geodetic dataset version referenced by /0/ has been temporarily delayed. Of course this entails that other EPSG changes, like new CRSs introduced, are not available this way either.
version indicator "0" (earlier indicating "latest version" as an informal, non-normative convention) is temporarily fixed to version 8.5.2
final solution, as per OGC-NA decision in March 2019:
version "0" shall always point to the latest version of the corresponding EPSG definition. (Caveat: this may imply unnoticed changes by EPSG)
Case Sensitivity
Request: (Simon Cox) I just discovered that the URI redirects associated with EPSG CRS parameters are case-sensitive, so http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/5711 and http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/epsg/0/5711generatedifferent responses: the former goes to SECORE, and the latter to the EPSG Indicio registry. This clearly is undesirable. They should go to the same place, and that place should be SECORE.
Resolution: There has been discussion with OGC since April 2016, but no authoritative decision has been made. Therefore, we continue using IETF 2141 (referenced by IETF 5165), sections 5 and 6: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2141 implying that SECORE should be case sensitive, as would be anything after the ogc namespace identifier. -- PeterBaumann - 19 Sep 2016
Redirection to the Resolver
Request: The redirection mechanism is currently not working as expected and it seems that only EPSG related definitions actually redirected to SECORE:
Resolution: SECORE, in the first place, maintains URLs only. Location of such a file and its reference in the EPSG definitions needs to be clarified. Problematic is that EPSG definitions are taken "as is" and not modified in any way. Therefore, such a request best should be made to OGP. -- PeterBaumann - 21 Oct 2016
The information you supply is used for OGC purposes only. We will never pass your contact details to any third party without your prior consent. If you enter content here you are agreeing to the OGC privacy policy.