Naming Conventions to be used in CCIP WMS/WCS/WFS Services
It will be helpful for CCIP if all services can use the same naming conventions wherever possible. This is not so much to enable interoperability (The OGC service definitions should do that) as to create some clarity and make it more straightforward to compare data from different services. These naming conventions are for things such as WCS coverage or WMS layer names, dataset names etc. Due to space constraints on wiki tables the suggested conventions are in the attached files (Excel and OpenOffice format). Revision notes: Version 0.1 contains sample definitions for discussion Version 1.0 contains complete definitions. Points for discussion:- Are the identifiers too long?
- Should we state the CRS as WGS84?
- ccipDataModelv_0_1.ods: Version 0.1 of naming conventions (Open Office format)
- ccipDataModelv_0_1.xls: Version 0.1 of naming conventions (MS Excel format)
| I | Attachment | Action | Size | Date | Who | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 ods |
ccipDataModelv_1_0.ods | manage | 13 K | 25 Sep 2009 - 13:00 | DominicLowe | Version 1.0 of the naming conventions (Open Office Format) |
 xls |
ccipDataModelv_1_0.xls | manage | 125 K | 25 Sep 2009 - 13:00 | DominicLowe | Version 1.0 of the naming conventions (MS Excel Format) |
This topic: ClimateChallenge2009 > WebHome > WorkingCCIPHome > NamingConventions
Topic revision: 25 Sep 2009, DominicLowe
Topic revision: 25 Sep 2009, DominicLowe
The information you supply is used for OGC purposes only. We will never pass your contact details to any third party without your prior consent. If you enter content here you are agreeing to the OGC privacy policy.
Copyright &© by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding OGC Public Wiki? Send feedback